Dernière mise à jour: Août 17, 2026

 

New Patient-Centric Perspectives in Medical

Recherche: Ethical and Governance Challenges

 

International Conference in Rome, 
28-29 Octobre 201

We are looking for Speakers. e-mail us: [email protected]

 

Over the past few years, there has been considerable debate over the regulations and guidelines required for the

governance of genomic projects and biobanks. Consent

from research participants is mandatory and it is now widely

accepted that there should be some form of public engagement to ensure public trust and to give the research endeavor

legitimacy. Although involvement of participants has been

regarded as important, the ways in which involvement has

been implemented in the research process has varied enormously depending upon different factors. More recently, patient groups and direct-to-consumer testing companies have

developed new forms of participant-centric approaches, par

using information technology that places the individual in control and at the centre of activities.

While consent and public deliberation strategies already provide a common ground for public participation and research

accountability in genomics, there is the possibility to use

these new forms of E-governance and IT-based tools and

apply them more widely. But to increase the involvement

of research participants beyond the consent form raises a

number of questions and challenges. To what extent should,

and do, participants want to be involved in the research process? Should participants be able to be more involved in the

oversight of a biobank or a research project? What influence

should participants have on research policy and trends in genomics? How much control by participants is actually ensured

through current research oversight mechanisms and how

much is desired by stakeholders and scientists? If the nature

of sequence information makes individuals potentially identifiable does this require a different relationship with research

participants? How can IT mechanisms assist in developing

tools and in supporting strategies to empower both researchers and participants? Could IT mechanisms change the way

that research is currently governed? How could IT help to

develop robust governance mechanisms for global research

and data sharing?

This conference will show case some new initiatives advancing a participant-centric approach and provide a forum for

critical discussion and appraisal.

 

We are looking for Speakers. e-mail us: [email protected]
Revue de cas scientifique

Examen de cas scientifiques

Souhaitez-vous savoir si les programmes cliniques actuels, développements récents en recherche, ou des approches émergentes peuvent être adapté à votre situation individuelle?

Partagez votre question avec notre équipe de recherche scientifique et recevez informations axées sur les domaines de recherche en cours qui peuvent être pertinent pour votre cas.

  • Examen des informations que vous fournissez
  • Informations pertinentes sur la recherche et les programmes cliniques
  • Une réponse claire et adaptée à votre situation
Que se passe-t-il ensuite? Envoyez votre question, recevoir une évaluation scientifique ciblée, et obtenez une réponse claire sur les programmes de recherche et cliniques pertinents à votre situation.
Votre revue scientifique sera préparée par Docteur. Hélène Melnik, Doctorat , qui a plus de 25 années d'expérience dans la recherche sur les cellules souches et les programmes cliniques internationaux.

Aucune obligation. Votre question sera examinée de manière confidentielle.

Informations pédagogiques et de recherche uniquement. Ce service ne constituer un avis médical, diagnostic, ordonnance, ou un personnalisé recommandation de traitement.


NBScience

organisme de recherche sous contrat

0 Commentaires

Laisser une réponse

Votre adresse email ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont marqués *

WhatsApp